National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula has come out to address growing criticism surrounding the newly enacted law that has sparked outrage among civil rights groups and members of the public.
The legislation, described by activists as draconian and repressive, has ignited heated debate across the country over its implications for freedom of expression.
Wetang’ula’s sentiments come amid mounting backlash over the Act, with human rights defenders and civil society organisations already petitioning the government to repeal or amend several sections they claim infringe on fundamental freedoms.
According to the petitioners, the law is punitive in nature and deliberately crafted to silence dissenting voices, limit press freedom, and weaken public accountability mechanisms.
In a recent public appearance, Wetang’ula was forced to cut his speech short after strong reactions from residents. He instead joined the crowd in chanting, in a display that appeared to signal solidarity with the constituents’ sentiments.
The moment highlighted the delicate position he occupies, attempting to defend the government’s position while acknowledging public mood.
Wetang’ula dismissed claims that the law was designed to stifle free speech, insisting that it seeks to promote responsibility in public communication and curb the spread of misinformation.
He argued that while freedom of expression is a constitutional right, it must be exercised within the bounds of respect and truth, adding that the government has an obligation to protect citizens from harmful or false information.
Critics, however, maintain that the government’s real intention is to muzzle journalists, opposition figures, and other dissenting voices ahead of the 2027 general elections. They warn that the new law could embolden state agencies to target individuals who speak out against government policies.
The controversy continues to fuel public discourse, with calls growing louder for Parliament to revisit the law. Wetang’ula now faces the challenge of balancing the government’s desire to maintain order with the public’s demand for unfettered freedom of expression — a test that may define political narratives in the coming months.
Tags
Politics